Post by indirac on Jun 15, 2004 17:08:43 GMT -5
Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum and am seeking some advice in learning to improvise better. I am primarily a classical guitarist, though I've always played steel strings (mostly electric) in the plectrum style. I'm entirely self-taught in this area, starting out with simple rock songs, then hendrix/srv and blues, then shred (vai/malmsteen/etc), then finally maturing (in my mind) into fusion & jazz (incidentally, this seems to be a common order of musical interests in other young guitarists I've met). My favorite jazz guitarists are, in no particular order, Pass, McLaughlin, Metheny, Django, and Wes. As a classical snob I am more than bit biased and so I feel like Joe Pass' more pianistic/orchestral approach is more technically advanced than people who do mostly single note stuff, but I'd kill to be able to play a single note solo like Metheny or McLaughlin (or Gambale, or Scott Henderson, etc).
Ok, enough boring background, here is my problem.
I've always improvised "by ear;" that is, by just sort of feeling my way around the fretboard in intervals. I have a good enough ear to realize more or less what I hear in my head this way, and I've memorized enough scale patterns that I can always be "safe" when improvising (though at the cost of creativity, I think). This method of improv works well enough for rock songs and easier jazz pieces, but falls on its face with modulations, non-diatonic progressions, etc. More importantly, I see no way to extend this kind of approach to improvising more harmonically a la Joe Pass, which is a direction I'd eventually like to take.
So, I'd like to formalize my approach more. I've been thinking about this a lot and it seems to me like the most formal way to improvise would be the following:
1) Memorize each note on the fretboard
2) Memorize which notes are in each chord in all keys
3) Memorize which modes/scales fit well over each chord
now, this is an awful lot to keep in mind in realtime. Aside from the commonly heard advice to "forget your theory when it's time to actually play" and just hope you've internalized it well enough, I wonder how many of these steps one is justified in skipping? For instance, instead of memorizing that CM7 has is spelled CEGB, it seems a lot easier to memorize the intervals of a M7 chord and apply that shape for different keys. However, then one runs into the problem of memorizing shapes; memorizing every inversion of all 15 or so common jazz chords is a monumental task.
Then there is also the issue of forgetting about chords and working out ahead of time which modes will work for a song. This seems infinitely easier and maybe more practical for songs built on simple vamp type progressions, but of course limits the possibility for improvising chordally. Is it a good idea to develop this as a seperate methodology for soloing over more modal jazz? It seems to be a valid approach for indian music, so why not?
So in any case, sorry for the rambling first post but I really feel like I have no idea what I should be working on. My technique is more or less fine for the time being, and I pretty much know all the notes on the fretboard (up to 12th fret) and most root position voicings for most of the common jazz chords. I have a good abstract grasp of theory (how chords/progressions are built, guide tones and chord connection, substitutions) but generally don't implement it while soloing. Should I be memorizing chord voicings and related modes? If so, should I memorize root voicings and leave notes out for inversions? If I'm learning a mode to play over a chord, should I memorize a shape for the chord that's easy to use (but abstracted from the theory), or memorize the notes in the mode and make up shapes as I go (though this would be more difficult to do fluidly in practice)?
I hope someone can help clear this up for me; I'm not sure which direction I should be going and don't want to waste time practicing incorrectly.
Thanks!
~Jeremy
Ok, enough boring background, here is my problem.
I've always improvised "by ear;" that is, by just sort of feeling my way around the fretboard in intervals. I have a good enough ear to realize more or less what I hear in my head this way, and I've memorized enough scale patterns that I can always be "safe" when improvising (though at the cost of creativity, I think). This method of improv works well enough for rock songs and easier jazz pieces, but falls on its face with modulations, non-diatonic progressions, etc. More importantly, I see no way to extend this kind of approach to improvising more harmonically a la Joe Pass, which is a direction I'd eventually like to take.
So, I'd like to formalize my approach more. I've been thinking about this a lot and it seems to me like the most formal way to improvise would be the following:
1) Memorize each note on the fretboard
2) Memorize which notes are in each chord in all keys
3) Memorize which modes/scales fit well over each chord
now, this is an awful lot to keep in mind in realtime. Aside from the commonly heard advice to "forget your theory when it's time to actually play" and just hope you've internalized it well enough, I wonder how many of these steps one is justified in skipping? For instance, instead of memorizing that CM7 has is spelled CEGB, it seems a lot easier to memorize the intervals of a M7 chord and apply that shape for different keys. However, then one runs into the problem of memorizing shapes; memorizing every inversion of all 15 or so common jazz chords is a monumental task.
Then there is also the issue of forgetting about chords and working out ahead of time which modes will work for a song. This seems infinitely easier and maybe more practical for songs built on simple vamp type progressions, but of course limits the possibility for improvising chordally. Is it a good idea to develop this as a seperate methodology for soloing over more modal jazz? It seems to be a valid approach for indian music, so why not?
So in any case, sorry for the rambling first post but I really feel like I have no idea what I should be working on. My technique is more or less fine for the time being, and I pretty much know all the notes on the fretboard (up to 12th fret) and most root position voicings for most of the common jazz chords. I have a good abstract grasp of theory (how chords/progressions are built, guide tones and chord connection, substitutions) but generally don't implement it while soloing. Should I be memorizing chord voicings and related modes? If so, should I memorize root voicings and leave notes out for inversions? If I'm learning a mode to play over a chord, should I memorize a shape for the chord that's easy to use (but abstracted from the theory), or memorize the notes in the mode and make up shapes as I go (though this would be more difficult to do fluidly in practice)?
I hope someone can help clear this up for me; I'm not sure which direction I should be going and don't want to waste time practicing incorrectly.
Thanks!
~Jeremy